Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1349076, member: 26302&quot;]If I am wrong I will of course retract what I said. Maybe my memory was wrong Rlm. Sorry. I just remembered, (perhaps wrongly), that the 63 was designated by TPG as above average, and the 65 the &quot;gem&quot;. This was why both grades had such price breaks at them. Yes I know later when Wall Street got involved it accentuated the 65 pricing, but even before then achieving a 63 or a 65 meant something. A 64 was nothing special, simply a little better 64, (or a &quot;near&quot; 65 depending on the salesman. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />).</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, that is how I remembered the pricing situation from numerous CoinWorld articles, etc. Again if I am remembering incorrectly I apologize.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in