Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 2018645, member: 15309&quot;]The numbers are absolutely incorrect.&nbsp; First, they don&#039;t even add correctly.&nbsp; Look at the 2006 numbers for MS69.&nbsp; This is how they read:</p><p><br /></p><p>1,211 (Copper) + 1,743 (Nickel) + 106,349 (Silver) + 106,921 (Gold) =&nbsp; 661,496</p><p><br /></p><p>Funny, my calculator yields 216,224</p><p><br /></p><p>But beyond that, do you really not have the ability to look at the numbers in that book and understand that they do in fact include modern coins?&nbsp; I don&#039;t have access to PCGS population reports but I do have access to NGC census.&nbsp; According to the numbers in the book you showed, in 2006, PCGS had graded 106,921 classic (pre 1964) gold coins MS69, and a whopping 4,325 MS70</p><p><br /></p><p>Wanna know what the current (2014) NGC populations are for classic gold?</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC MS69 Gold Coins:&nbsp; 16</p><p>NGC MS70 Gold Coins:&nbsp; 0</p><p><br /></p><p>What about Nickel coins.&nbsp; The 2006 PCGS population for pre 1964 nickel coins is 1,743 for MS69 and 89 for MS70.</p><p><br /></p><p>Wanna know what the current (2014) NGC populations are for classic Nickel?</p><p><br /></p><p>NGC MS69 Nickel Coins:&nbsp; 0</p><p>NGC MS69 Nickel Coins:&nbsp; 0</p><p><br /></p><p>You have professed that you will always admit when you are wrong.&nbsp; Well here is your chance to be a man of your word.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in