Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 2018195, member: 112&quot;]Here ya go Paul.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]364765[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]364766[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>What you have there are pictures of the PCGS pop report from the end of 2003 showing the totals in all grades of all those coins that they graded from 1986 through 2003. 17 years worth of graded coins in other words.</p><p><br /></p><p>These below are pictures of the PCGS pop report from the beginning of 2006. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]364767[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]364768[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What these two documents show is the difference, the increases in population numbers in just 2 years time. You can look and compare all of the increases of course, but you might want to pay particular attention to the increases in the MS65 and up numbers. They are huge increases.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oh, and you might also want to notice that the documents from 2006, state that <u>modern coins are excluded</u> from those numbers.&nbsp; So all of those huge increases you see, those increases are for classic coins only. And the documents from 2003, those populations <u>do include modern coins</u> along with classic coins. So imagine how much lower all of those numbers of 65 and up from 2003 would be, if you excluded modern coins from them. That&#039;s makes the increases even bigger. And in just 2 years (2004 &amp; 2005), as compared to the previous 17 years.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now you&#039;ll probably say this doesn&#039;t prove anything either. But when you see huge increases in pop numbers like that, there&#039;s only 1 explanation. They changed their grading standards, and they did it in 2004.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in