How much would a perfect uncirculated 70+ Sacagawea 2000 coin be?

nevermind modern value convos arent worth it

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

How about posting a photo?

 

$20 bucks too have a 2009 PF 69 DCam
And I can’t give it away

 

Since Sacagawea's are clad, most are not worth much of anything unless you have MS/PR 70 reverse proofs or enhanced finishes. And those are only worth something because you have collectors who would want them. Too bad they didn't come out with a real gold Sacagawea for 2000.

 

They’re so ugly I don’t see how you can hurt them more than they are. Normally though I wouldn’t even put distilled water on a 70.

 

Sheldon Scale?

 

let's see it...

 

Sure, let's use Sheldon's approach! Since even a PO01 Sac is worth its face value of $1, that means every uncirculated Sac I have is worth at least $60!

 

Kinda like the $2 bill, nobody wants them

 

Didn’t they mint like 20 in gold that first year? I want to say they were flown into space onboard the shuttle Columbia’s STS-93 mission.

 

Eddie, even though it might sound confusing, the purer the water , the more reactive it is. Most modern cities tap water is less chemical reactive than extremely purified pure H20. Jim

 

https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/2000-w-sac-1-22kt-gold-dcam/508062

 

Interesting. That's useful to know, Jim.

 

None of US have seen photos.
Maybe @Howard Ryan takes some modest photos?

Not a bad starting point if they ever were deemed collectible.
There are underground bunkers full of these coins

Is that Yours.
Kuddos if it is.

 

I've seen this claim before, but I'd like to see some support. I'm at a loss as to how it could be true, and arguments I'm finding in favor have obvious flaws. It's reminding me of polywater.

 

Not really "reactive", but I'm sure you have heard that water is the "universal solvent" and if it doesn't have anything dissolved in it, it wants to dissolve stuff.

 

I sold a 2000p Cheerios dollar for $6,600 in 2016. It was graded at a MS-68. It was in its original packaging and was only removed to be graded. I have another that was also in its original package and it was just graded at a MS-67. I can let you know what it sells for in June.

 

You sold cheap.

 

I know water dissolves lots of things, and I know about the common-ion effect (and a lot of exceptions to it), but I'm not aware of anything that makes water that's 0.01% saturated with a particular salt somehow more viciously corrosive than water that's 0.1% saturated.

People use special containers and plumbing for ultra-pure water, because if they use regular fittings, the water will dissolve a tiny bit of the container -- and then it isn't ultra-pure any more. But it doesn't dissolve any more of the container or fittings than plain old tap water. Does it?

 

Jeff, this forum has some differing opinions, and the 3rd post seems to have a better background, but as with many questions : maybe yes, maybe no, none use coins though. Jim

https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/7467/is-pure-water-very-corrosive