Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;iPen, post: 2442328, member: 69760&quot;]I think after some deliberation, my position is that I&#039;ll keep classic and older OGPs (so generally 1950&#039;s and prior). Even the early tab holders that GDJMSP posted a pic of above have a certain antique appeal to them.</p><p><br /></p><p>But modern OGPs I won&#039;t keep unless they&#039;re only the square Quadrum-like capsules. That makes me wonder... if after a couple or so decades from now, will there be an antique appeal to these modern OGPs?</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, I&#039;ve said this before, but this Poland proof&#039;s OGP is what I&#039;m referring to below. Maybe use an inert black foam instead like the Canada one below, and include a silvered text with basic info. It&#039;ll be like the US Mint is slabbing their own coins, while minimizing cost and material waste - no clam shell display case, no separate COA (maybe include that info as mini silvered text on the underside of the inert foam), a basic protective sleeve over the square capsule, and they slide right in perfectly into the 12-pocket archival pages. I&#039;d say this is one of the rarer times that it&#039;d be value-added by having less. I&#039;d keep these as-is (maybe w/o the sleeve though).</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]509206[/ATTACH]</p><p><img src="https://www.cointalk.com/attachments/upload_2016-6-11_22-53-31-png.509190/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in