Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TIF, post: 2254679, member: 56859&quot;]I agree with the others.&nbsp; Greg, your coin is very appealing despite the off-center obverse.&nbsp; In its favor, the entire head is present.</p><p><br /></p><p>Casual observation of off-center portrait appeal and prices makes me think this is the general order of devaluation.&nbsp; 1 has the least adverse effect on appeal and 8 the greatest.</p><p><br /></p><p>1.&nbsp; Back of head slightly off flan or significantly off-center in that direction</p><p>2.&nbsp; Top of head slightly off flan or off in that direction</p><p>3.&nbsp; (or tied with 2) Chin/neck slightly off flan or off-center in that direction</p><p>4.&nbsp; Nose or face slightly off flan or off in that direction</p><p>5, 6, 7, 8:&nbsp; repeat the above ranking, but with more of the head off flan.</p><p><br /></p><p>This ranking may not hold if the coin has legends, particularly if the legends are a significant part of the coin&#039;s desirability.&nbsp; Roman portrait coins, especially higher-priced coins such as JC or Otho, have more value and appeal if the name is on the flan.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is of course only <i>my</i> opinion <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in