Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Cucumbor, post: 2254664, member: 4298&quot;]Same here. </p><p>Full centering would of course be better, but nothing on your coin detracts from a high eye appeal. As long as the devices are present there&#039;s nothing wrong. The same off centering on the reverse would have been another story. And the unperfection makes it more lively. The other examples shown are on the same line</p><p><br /></p><p>The following one is just right, to my eyes at least. A bit more of off centering would have been a disaster. As it is I got it for a very good price in comparison to what a plain one would have set me back</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.forumancientcoins.com/gallery/albums/userpics/11724/0010-069d.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><b> L. Aemilius Lepidus Paullus </b> Rome mint, 62 BC</p><p>PAVLLUS - LEPIDVS {CONCORDIA] diademed and draped bust of concordia right</p><p>Trophy with Lepidus Paullus on the right and three captives on the left (king Perseus of Macedon and his sons). TER above and PAVLLVS at exergue</p><p>4.00 gr</p><p>Ref : RCV # 366, RSC, Aemilia # 10 </p><p><br /></p><p>Q[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in