"Standards" in just about everything has and will change. One would think that it's the magnitude of change that's most important. However, that can be argued in numismatics. A one point change in grade can be worth thousands.
The important part is that anything static that never changes just means it’s outdated, wrong, or clueless. Aside from 2+2 equals 4 I would hate to live in a world where a standard never changes with increased knowledge. Despite what some say numismatic knowledge has increased over the last few decades and will continue to as does everything else
Another point to consider is what drives standard changes. For consumer products either the consumer or business drives the change. My guess is that in future years a new grading scale will be adopted which will be a cash cow for the TPGs.
The time to worry is if no change ever happens and we're stuck in decades old standards and ability. The most disingenuous part of it all is that no one here is grading from the original first invented standards, so they're fine with changes but once they get set in their ways everyone should get off their lawn because change is bad
*re-education. Kinda hard to learn a standard when it is always changing (aka: there are no standards).
How else are you supposed to cope with ever-changing standards without having to re-educate yourself? I think you are just countering everything I say just to be difficult.
Weird coin. I don't do much with gold but the luster looks absolutely BOOMING in that trueview, but there are distracting lines all over it?! Devices still look frosty.
Morgans can have fields with booming luster and frosty devices and be covered in die polish lines. Gold coins are no different