Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 1027925, member: 2972&quot;]In my opinion, there would be little premium for a coin toned as such.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Here&#039;s how I would evaluate the toning premium on the buy side (i.e. if I were considering purchasing it):</p><p><br /></p><p>Using PCGS price guide as an example, the retail price for this coin is listed in 63 for $235.&nbsp; The retail price for the coin in the next higher grade, 64, is $280.&nbsp; I would expect an appropriate price for the coin to be between the two (i.e. some small premium, but not to exceed the price of the next grade up) -- $250-ish sounds about right.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the coin and on the sell side....&nbsp; The coin has a few negatives, IMO: (1) splotchy, (2) reverse rather than obverse toning, (3) a common toning pattern/coloration (i.e. none of the money greens or neons), and (4) the luster appears a bit flat (which perhaps explains the 63 grade, as the surfaces seem clean for a 63).&nbsp; Marketed correctly it can bring a bit of a premium (perhaps by taking complimentary photos), but I would not expect that you could sell it easily to a dealer for anything but greysheet.&nbsp; A specialist dealer may offer a bit more.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>That said, I&#039;m not aware of the relative toner rarity of this particular date, and that could be a factor which could sway the valuation -- perhaps someone more familiar with the series can comment in this regard.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of the above IMO &amp; respectfully submitted.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in