Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2712605, member: 1892&quot;]I think he&#039;s shooting jpg&#039;s instead of RAW for workload considerations, and skewing towards his &quot;average&quot; coin with in-camera processing, which would make more colorful coins difficult to duplicate in-hand. I&#039;ve only two coins in-hand which can offer any sort of comparison, my 1910-S Lincoln and the 1957 shown here:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.pcgs.com/cert/33305424" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/cert/33305424" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/cert/33305424</a></p><p><br /></p><p>....and although I have to fiddle for quite a while with lighting (LED lighting won&#039;t touch it, so the Jansjos are useless), I can come close enough to his images with both to believe that freeing them from the slab would make up the difference. It&#039;s conceivable that his settings could lead to oversaturation of the most colorful of his subjects; I haven&#039;t seen enough of them to have an opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p>I won&#039;t be cracking the 1910-S any time soon, but I might crack the 1957 as an experiment. Except, for the moment, I&#039;ve no free time aside that dedicated to the project you&#039;ve gotten me into. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I have spent 18 hours over the last two days <i>just postprocessing images</i>. Nothing else except for sanity breaks to look in here every few hours. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in