Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by JayAg47, Dec 9, 2020.
Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.
If you have documentary evidence of an old provenance, particularly an illustration, it is likely to be for a good reason.
I have to at least challenge this statement - especially a Severan from the @dougsmit collection is in my view, likely to be considered premium provenance. I suspect I am not the only one.
Rob, I wonder how many people actually bought these catalogs compared with receiving them gratis. (Sort of like today..) In the grand scheme of things, they were very expensive! But do you think Mr. Lockett had to cough up his shillings each month to get a Glens catalog?
And of course no bidder’s premium back then. And many coins were relatively much cheaper. So I don’t feel so bad for the collectors of yesteryear.
I don't know the answer to that. A quick perusal of the buyers at the Bruun sale tells us nothing that wasn't already known in that most big name buyers will have placed commission bids via the two regular suspects - Spink & Baldwin. I can only identify just over a dozen buyers who I know were collectors first and foremost, or at least not known as dealers. I suspect a good number of people were provided with catalogues, but equally a lot of catalogues were printed and the cost had to be covered where possible. Maybe the vendor paid for them and then tried to recoup the cost.
I had fun tracking down a couple of my coins history and with the help of the board I found the original catalog the coin was listed in. Here is the thread.
The Numismatic Gumshoe on the Hunt for Provenance | Coin Talk
@BenSi that is a very cool thing to do for a living! I wish I was employed doing something that is connected to my hobbies. I am actually also a collector of old books, so I wish there was a book sub-section in coin talk! My main area is religious themes and I am currently researching an old English Bible from the early 1700s that is full of nice folio-sized copper engravings. Unfortunately the artist is not mentioned in the title page so I don't know where to start. Any tips? Here is a sample:
My living room smells of lavender as my bookcase is covered in it (Got to keep those bookworms away).
And to stay on topic, provenance is a very important aspect of our hobby. I wish more sellers/auction houses would adapt an approach of where the provenance path of every coin is well documented. I don't care if some names would be the average John Smith, but it would be a great way of protecting the coins from unfavorable future legislation, which I believe is a real danger to our hobby. You see we live in 'sensitive' times where this type of legislation is very attractive to politicians as they can be draconian and look good to their 'progressive' audiences. A good recent example is what happened to UK dealers and collectors of antiques containing ivory... Just because some nasty poachers are hunting elephants to extinction in Africa, the UK government thought that it would help by banning the selling of ivory containing antiques and artifacts even if these are hundreds of years old. Only 'masterpieces' are exempt, and what is a masterpiece would be defined by some panel.. I don't know the final form of the legislation, but the collector societies I belong are still trying to put some sense into the government bureaucrats. Antique dealers and collectors specializing in items such as Japanese Netsuke facing their valuable collections becoming worthless.
However the hunt for provenance can lead one down some very interesting rabbit holes. Last January I bought this coin. Yes everyone has seen it. It has been in my 2020 Top 10.
Gallienus Av Reduced Aureus 266-267 AD RIC 118 1.43 grms 18 mm Photo by W. Hansen. I found it in the Roma E auction 66 Lot 1116 and it referred to it being in the NAC Auction 49 Lot 375 (2008) When I looked up the NAC auction it is now that I ran into Apostole Zeno. NAC claimed that it was in the Zeno Collection Lot 2013 sold in 1955. This was not confirmed by Roma which is a bad sign. Okay looked up the Zeno Auction
Well this is clearly not the same coin. but I continued to search
Found it. The coin is clearly lot 2019 which is confirmed by Gobl. So what do I got here Well...
The coin was originaly owned by this guy Apostolo Zeno who wrote operas for the Haspburg royal family. First he lived in Venice.
Then he moved to Vienna
Eventually the coin got here to the Monastary of St Florian
Where it stayed until it put up in auction and bought by this guy
Leo Biaggi de Blasys. He was a major collector of Roman Aureii and at one time was worked for the International Committee of the Red Cross This is his signature
It let this guy named in this document as Ricardo Klement get into Argentina and it is at his trial the world became familiar with the word Mossad
Adolph Eichmann YUUUCH Nazis Well for a while the coin stayed here in Genoa
Now it is here in Edmonton Alberta Canada
Well in this Covid induced shutdown provenance or pedigrees can provide some forms of entertainment
As fakes get better, a provenance from a respected source can serve as a point of authenticity, I suppose. Idk
Sadly might not be one persons work a studio of people. However in the 18th century artists normally signed works. That is what believes me to be it is from a artist group.
@Alegandron ) has an amazing collection that could not be more different than my own. However, there is one thing that brings our collections together, Brian and I both collect the stories of the coins as much as we collect the coins themselves. (I do hope that when it is safe to do so he will join me at my house in the great white north where we will consume too many steaks and too much of our fine Canadian beer) He has a standing invitation to do just that. For me the story of the coin is paramount and in some cases the provenance of a coin can be an important part of that story. If I were to own a coin of Brians in the future it would be because of a personal connection. There are other less personal stories as well that might make the provenance meaningful.
As to coin hoards, I find that owning such a coin from a known hoard enhances the story for me. If we can trace the coin back to the ground it begs questions such as: Who buried it? Why was it it buried? Did the owner go off to war or bury the coins because of an invasion?How did the owner come to amass such a group of coins? Is there a thematic connection between the coins that may imply a collection? Were they buried in a time of plague? Did the previous owner keep slaves? How many languages did the previous owner speak and which ones?
Knowing the name of a previous owner also means something to me. Again a previous owner is part of the story of the coin. I am thrilled to own coins from the collection of fellow collector and friend @David Atherton . Though I value the friendship there is also value in the fact that David is a well known collector of Flavian coins, and a coin from his collection has been curated by someone who knows the subject very well. Though I never knew Harry Sneh, I respect coins from his collection because David respects these as well. In short, provenance is about trust. It is not 100% of course but it does increase the probability of buying an authentic coin if it has passed through the hands of people I trust.
I count myself lucky to own coins that were owned by people like E.E. Clain-Stefanelli, William Stancomb, Michel Prieur, Michael Kelly, Richard McAlee, Giovanni Dattari, Paul Schurer, Fritz Reusing, J Eric Engstrom, Phil Peck, and others of note. It so happens that where these refer to authors I try to have a copy of the book as well. In a number of cases these books include the publication of the coin as well. After all of the above have added their stories to the stories of the coins. Who would want to lose those connections.
Will I pay more for provenance? I certainly will if the name is important to me or to the curation of my collection. One thing I know for sure is that having a coin from a collection such as David's changes the complexion of my collection.
In short, provenance may become important for legal reasons in the future but it will always be important for adding to the stories these coins can tell.
Namaste, Andrew. Thank you for the kind comments.
I look forward to visiting when this mess is over with!
Bovine and Canadian Barley Pop! Yum!
I am only a couple of hours drive away... so I need to be in the room to at least document the conversation (and drink the beer)!!
As for provenance... uugh tough one. My coins are fairly low end and its cool to have. As I have started to save a bit and buy slightly nicer coins .. its a bonus but not a deal breaker for me.
My friend you would be welcome to the beer, the steak and the conversation!
(ummm...did I mention I have a 14cubic foot refrigerator in my basement?)
Should totally share that! Even using PM (if you want to stay private about it) .. would be appreciated I am sure!
I personally don't think it matters unless it's from a widely popular figure or a prominent hoard. Even then, it would have to be at the upper end of that group.
Provenance, other than possibly improving chances of authenticity, means little to me. Does it guarantee authenticity? Nope. Nothing does. Do I feel better because I have a piece of someone's previous collection? No. I guess as a non-numismatist, previous ownership means little to me. (I admit I would find a coin more interesting if one could prove it belonged to a historically significant person such as Louis XIV of France or Thomas Jefferson, however.)
But by my knowing that a coin comes form a specific hoard, I feel like I'm really "holding a piece of history in my hands."
Here's an inexpensive and otherwise unremarkable example of my point:
(My visitor, not my pictures.)
Is the coin rare or expensive? No, but the history, for me, is priceless:
Trying to put a coin into a historical context is the most exciting aspect of numismatics for me.
Separate names with a comma.