Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
How good is good enough, an interesting RR bronze
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="rrdenarius, post: 3453001, member: 75525"]The average condition of my RR bronze coins is lower than my RR silver. I find well worn bronze coins that shill show its major features good enough. I purchased a coin today that would normally be below the line. You can tell why I bought this coin from the obverse. Who would you expect on the obverse of a 3 dotter (Quadrans)?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]917867[/ATTACH] </p><p>I do not like the ruff surfaces on this coin. The major features are there. You can tell it is an older coin because of the form of the letter A.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]917868[/ATTACH] This is the most common form of the letter A in early struck bronze coins, before 200 BC. A few other forms are common:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]917869[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]917870[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]917871[/ATTACH] </p><p>The letter A we use today was a latecomer, 150 BC.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]917872[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Normally a Quadrans would have Hercules on the obverse. </p><p>[ATTACH]917878[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>This coin has:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]917877[/ATTACH] </p><p><b>Mercury</b>. </p><p><br /></p><p>Roman Republic, anonymous AE Quadrans, Luceria, ca. 211-208 BC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Obv - Head of Mercury on the right, above three dots °°°, below L. </p><p>Rev – Prow of Roman warship, in ex: three dots °°°.</p><p>Weight = 10.51 grams</p><p>Diameter = 23.3 mm</p><p><br /></p><p>Cr. 97 / 13d</p><p>BMCRR – Italy _ _ , Grueber assignes no number to the Hercules / prow Quadrans shown between Italy #6 & Italy #7. There is no description in the main text for a Quadrans with Mercury, but one is mentioned in the notes. Grueber II pg 147 in footnote 3: “D’Ailly (Mon rom, pl. civ., nos. 4, 5) figures two quadrantes with the obverse type of the sextans, i.e. bust of Mercury…. which must be due to a blunder on the part of the die engraver. “</p><p>Garrucci – pg. 69, Table LXXXI #3</p><p><br /></p><p>I have another error on a Quadrans. </p><p>[ATTACH]917890[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]917892[/ATTACH] </p><p>3 dots on obverse & 4 on reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>Post your not quite right coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="rrdenarius, post: 3453001, member: 75525"]The average condition of my RR bronze coins is lower than my RR silver. I find well worn bronze coins that shill show its major features good enough. I purchased a coin today that would normally be below the line. You can tell why I bought this coin from the obverse. Who would you expect on the obverse of a 3 dotter (Quadrans)? [ATTACH=full]917867[/ATTACH] I do not like the ruff surfaces on this coin. The major features are there. You can tell it is an older coin because of the form of the letter A. [ATTACH=full]917868[/ATTACH] This is the most common form of the letter A in early struck bronze coins, before 200 BC. A few other forms are common: [ATTACH=full]917869[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]917870[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]917871[/ATTACH] The letter A we use today was a latecomer, 150 BC. [ATTACH=full]917872[/ATTACH] Normally a Quadrans would have Hercules on the obverse. [ATTACH]917878[/ATTACH] This coin has: [ATTACH=full]917877[/ATTACH] [B]Mercury[/B]. Roman Republic, anonymous AE Quadrans, Luceria, ca. 211-208 BC. Obv - Head of Mercury on the right, above three dots °°°, below L. Rev – Prow of Roman warship, in ex: three dots °°°. Weight = 10.51 grams Diameter = 23.3 mm Cr. 97 / 13d BMCRR – Italy _ _ , Grueber assignes no number to the Hercules / prow Quadrans shown between Italy #6 & Italy #7. There is no description in the main text for a Quadrans with Mercury, but one is mentioned in the notes. Grueber II pg 147 in footnote 3: “D’Ailly (Mon rom, pl. civ., nos. 4, 5) figures two quadrantes with the obverse type of the sextans, i.e. bust of Mercury…. which must be due to a blunder on the part of the die engraver. “ Garrucci – pg. 69, Table LXXXI #3 I have another error on a Quadrans. [ATTACH]917890[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]917892[/ATTACH] 3 dots on obverse & 4 on reverse. Post your not quite right coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
How good is good enough, an interesting RR bronze
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...