Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
How far back do we define coins as ancient?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2507648, member: 19463"]The question I have to ask is whether the ID of this coin to Constantine XI has any basis other than the provenance of the coin to that one hoard that included a few coins from which scholars derived the legends as quoted in the sale listing. The strike and centering does not allow my inexpert eyes to see anything I'd pay 1/100th their estimate for but someone certainly will bid high based on faith. </p><p><br /></p><p>The last 'reasonable' Byzantine coin is from John VIII 21 July 1425–</p><p>31 October 1448, the next to last emperor, whose coins were struck when the situation in the city was a power of ten less desperate. John's name appears on this one at the top of the portrait which is still a bit crude but much more normal than the ones found for his brother Constantine. There is a difference of opinion on which side to call the obverse. I have the John side on the left and Christ on the right because the coin appears to have been made with John on the anvil die. There are those who say Christ must always be called the obverse. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]532918[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2507648, member: 19463"]The question I have to ask is whether the ID of this coin to Constantine XI has any basis other than the provenance of the coin to that one hoard that included a few coins from which scholars derived the legends as quoted in the sale listing. The strike and centering does not allow my inexpert eyes to see anything I'd pay 1/100th their estimate for but someone certainly will bid high based on faith. The last 'reasonable' Byzantine coin is from John VIII 21 July 1425– 31 October 1448, the next to last emperor, whose coins were struck when the situation in the city was a power of ten less desperate. John's name appears on this one at the top of the portrait which is still a bit crude but much more normal than the ones found for his brother Constantine. There is a difference of opinion on which side to call the obverse. I have the John side on the left and Christ on the right because the coin appears to have been made with John on the anvil die. There are those who say Christ must always be called the obverse. [ATTACH=full]532918[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
How far back do we define coins as ancient?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...