Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jallengomez, post: 1060963, member: 19748&quot;]<p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Originally Posted by <b>jallengomez</b>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/showthread.php?p=1060265#post1060265" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/showthread.php?p=1060265#post1060265"><img src="http://www.cointalk.com/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">ANACS-(Granted that from the photo it doesn&#039;t seem to have the luster of the other two, but compare the marks.)</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Keep in mind that I said &quot;from the photo.&quot;&nbsp; I was giving ANACS a little bit of the benefit of the doubt here because the PCGS and NGC coins were from more recent auctions.&nbsp; The first ANACS ms-66 I came to was from back in 2008.&nbsp; I just assumed Heritage&#039;s photography had gotten much better.&nbsp; Here&#039;s another PCGS ms-66 from around the same time period(2008)&nbsp; It seems like if we go back to &#039;08 the luster on all the coins photographed back then left a little to be desired. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]104730.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in