Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Curtis, post: 24631012, member: 26430&quot;]AND it&#039;s an Adventus type, very cool coin! (Here&#039;s the <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=9824787" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=9824787" rel="nofollow">ACSearch record of its Heritage appearance</a> last year.)</p><p><br /></p><p>If we&#039;re counting the later AE ones issued intermittently, there&#039;s also Probus and, especially, Aurelian. (And <a href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8197012" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=8197012" rel="nofollow">even Diocletian</a>. A few others, I presume.) I&#039;ve got a few of the Aurelians in my &quot;<a href="https://conservatoricoins.com/selections-from-the-bce-collection/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://conservatoricoins.com/selections-from-the-bce-collection/" rel="nofollow">Barbarians &amp; Captives</a>&quot; coll., which are actually fairly common and come in many different sub-varieties:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1566823[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve even seen the small module Tetrarchic AEs described as &quot;1/4 Follis or Denarius&quot; (but usually in French or German!), like this otherwise forgettable Constantius Chlorus (and its awful draft photo I took when inventorying &quot;group coins&quot; not individually cataloged). </p><p><br /></p><p>But I have yet to track down what evidence or argumentation actually supports calling them &quot;Denarius&quot; (or any other specific term, other than some generic like &quot;nummus&quot;):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1566824[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in