Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Endeavor, post: 2839372, member: 60292&quot;]A nice <a href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&amp;pub=5575067756&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337418160&amp;customid=&amp;icep_item=292229047802&amp;ipn=psmain&amp;icep_vectorid=229466&amp;kwid=902099&amp;mtid=824&amp;kw=lg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&amp;pub=5575067756&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5337418160&amp;customid=&amp;icep_item=292229047802&amp;ipn=psmain&amp;icep_vectorid=229466&amp;kwid=902099&amp;mtid=824&amp;kw=lg" rel="nofollow">Flying Eagle cent</a> graded Mint State 62 by NGC <u>with a counterstamp</u>.</p><p><br /></p><p>Apparently this counterstamp is popular (???) cause NGC has a designation for it, instead of Details (for post mint damage).</p><p><br /></p><p>I guess collectors of these will be fine with it while purists will not be thrilled. I personally think because of the alteration some sort of details designation should be given (with a description of counterstamp thereafter). It just feels a little disingenuous to let some marks slide and others not.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in