Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
How did Ancient Romans deal with constantly debased coinage?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="JayAg47, post: 7632105, member: 112342"]By 250s there were two silver coins in circulation, denarius and the much more common antoninianus (which were mostly minted from the recalled denarii), and the later is worth 1.5 times more than a denarius, doesn't matter if the denarius is worth more in silver, the government established the value and the people had to follow it like we are doing with fiat currency.</p><p>However it wouldn't have stopped some enterprising individuals to hoard good quality silver coins for long term value, like today's silver stackers, or some merchants taking them away from Rome where the coins are worth it's value in metal.</p><p>By the time of Gallienus (250s), antoninianus was nothing but a copper coin coated with a thin wash of silver, yet it still would've had the same purchasing power of a denarius from the 1st century.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1312929[/ATTACH]</p><p>A denarius has the emperor wearing a laurel wreath, while an antoninianus has him wearing a radiate crown, and that's how people distinguished the coins.</p><p>For example here is an ant of Aurelian compared to his denarius (one of the last denarius denomination ever minted) (270-275 AD). Even though they're both copper, I'm sure the ant would've bought more than the denarius!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1312930[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="JayAg47, post: 7632105, member: 112342"]By 250s there were two silver coins in circulation, denarius and the much more common antoninianus (which were mostly minted from the recalled denarii), and the later is worth 1.5 times more than a denarius, doesn't matter if the denarius is worth more in silver, the government established the value and the people had to follow it like we are doing with fiat currency. However it wouldn't have stopped some enterprising individuals to hoard good quality silver coins for long term value, like today's silver stackers, or some merchants taking them away from Rome where the coins are worth it's value in metal. By the time of Gallienus (250s), antoninianus was nothing but a copper coin coated with a thin wash of silver, yet it still would've had the same purchasing power of a denarius from the 1st century. [ATTACH=full]1312929[/ATTACH] A denarius has the emperor wearing a laurel wreath, while an antoninianus has him wearing a radiate crown, and that's how people distinguished the coins. For example here is an ant of Aurelian compared to his denarius (one of the last denarius denomination ever minted) (270-275 AD). Even though they're both copper, I'm sure the ant would've bought more than the denarius! [ATTACH=full]1312930[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
How did Ancient Romans deal with constantly debased coinage?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...