Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Maxfli, post: 7871968, member: 69089&quot;]Seriously? Do you even read what you write? You&#039;re the one who made this thread a legal discussion by referring to artificial toning as fraud and posting links to (irrelevant) court cases.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps you should stop playing armchair lawyer and respond to the original question, here expanded in the hope that you&#039;ll find it easier to understand:</p><p><br /></p><p><i>If someone knowingly buys a coin with suspicious toning, how will you establish that the buyer is a victim of fraud, given<i> that there&#039;s no definitive test to <i>distinguish <i>NT from AT</i></i></i>? Even among coin collectors, the line between NT and AT is sometimes blurred. How do you expect that to be different for a judge or jury?</i></p><p><i></i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in