Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
How come...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1361131, member: 66"]That is the official line but probably not accurate considering vending machines coin mechanisms back then were strictly mechanical and didn't check electromagnetic properties of the coins. Also if that was the case then today's vending machines wouldn't be rejecting silver. In fact the machines back then DID have difficulties accepting both types because of the weight difference. (I also don't believe they have the same electromagnetic signatures because that is what allows a discriminating metal detector to tell the difference between a clad quarter and a silver one.)</p><p><br /></p><p>What we were really wanting was a composition that was counterfeit resistant. The clad composition was very difficult to produce and it was thought to be a built in anti-counterfeiting feature.</p><p><br /></p><p>Most countries switched from silver to coppernickel decades before we did during a time when it was much more important to maintain the appearence that the coinage was not being debased and the solid coppernickel didn't stick the change right in their face. (Especially for those countries that had originally done a debasement first to 500 fine and then later to complete elimination.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1361131, member: 66"]That is the official line but probably not accurate considering vending machines coin mechanisms back then were strictly mechanical and didn't check electromagnetic properties of the coins. Also if that was the case then today's vending machines wouldn't be rejecting silver. In fact the machines back then DID have difficulties accepting both types because of the weight difference. (I also don't believe they have the same electromagnetic signatures because that is what allows a discriminating metal detector to tell the difference between a clad quarter and a silver one.) What we were really wanting was a composition that was counterfeit resistant. The clad composition was very difficult to produce and it was thought to be a built in anti-counterfeiting feature. Most countries switched from silver to coppernickel decades before we did during a time when it was much more important to maintain the appearence that the coinage was not being debased and the solid coppernickel didn't stick the change right in their face. (Especially for those countries that had originally done a debasement first to 500 fine and then later to complete elimination.)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
How come...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...