Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
How coin error collecting has evolved
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 4854925, member: 5629"]I am going to focus simply on the "double die shift" term you alluded to.</p><p><br /></p><p>As early as 1969 (13th Edition), Yeoman was using the term Dbl Die in the Red Book. Now, this could had meant "Double Die shift", but I would contend that it had probably stood for "Doubled Die". Alan Herbert's 1974 book <i>The Official Guide to Mint Errors</i> identifies these errors as "Doubled Die". I have Spadone's 4th Edition from 1967 and he certainly uses "Double Die Shift".</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, if Spadone uses the same term in the 1977 edition, then I would contend that "Doubled Die" and "Double Die Shift" may have grown up together just as EF and XF and is simply a matter of preference. That is, if anyone else other than Spadone utilized that term.</p><p><br /></p><p>At least by the fifth edition of <i>The Green Coin Book</i> in 1966, Friedberg was using the term "Double Die" which continued through the 1996 edition of the catalog. The 1973 edition of <i>The Official Black Book</i> also utilized the same term. This same term is echoed in the 1971 Krause.</p><p><br /></p><p>Getting desperate to find anything that exactly agrees with Spadone, I have moved on to some more obscure sources. <i>Coin Collectors Digest</i> Vol. 1 No. V (February 1965) references the Lincoln 1955DDO as a "Double Strike". Yeah...obscure reference...we'll ignore those next time.</p><p><br /></p><p>Taking a plunge, I checked the index to <i>The Numismatic Scrapbook</i> for 1955 to see what they may have termed the discovery of the 1955DDO (since I found one dealer term it simply as a 1955/1955 in the 1960 volume of said magazine). Lo and behold! In the January edition, there is an article about Mercury dimes. The title of the article is <i>"Double Die" Dimes</i>, however, throughout the article the term "doubled die" is used.</p><p><br /></p><p>At this point, I would contend that Spadone may have been trying to change a well rooted term to his own liking. I cannot seem to find any reference to the use of "double die shift" anywhere else. However, I have hardly exhausted the sources available to research the issue.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NPCoin, post: 4854925, member: 5629"]I am going to focus simply on the "double die shift" term you alluded to. As early as 1969 (13th Edition), Yeoman was using the term Dbl Die in the Red Book. Now, this could had meant "Double Die shift", but I would contend that it had probably stood for "Doubled Die". Alan Herbert's 1974 book [I]The Official Guide to Mint Errors[/I] identifies these errors as "Doubled Die". I have Spadone's 4th Edition from 1967 and he certainly uses "Double Die Shift". Now, if Spadone uses the same term in the 1977 edition, then I would contend that "Doubled Die" and "Double Die Shift" may have grown up together just as EF and XF and is simply a matter of preference. That is, if anyone else other than Spadone utilized that term. At least by the fifth edition of [I]The Green Coin Book[/I] in 1966, Friedberg was using the term "Double Die" which continued through the 1996 edition of the catalog. The 1973 edition of [I]The Official Black Book[/I] also utilized the same term. This same term is echoed in the 1971 Krause. Getting desperate to find anything that exactly agrees with Spadone, I have moved on to some more obscure sources. [I]Coin Collectors Digest[/I] Vol. 1 No. V (February 1965) references the Lincoln 1955DDO as a "Double Strike". Yeah...obscure reference...we'll ignore those next time. Taking a plunge, I checked the index to [I]The Numismatic Scrapbook[/I] for 1955 to see what they may have termed the discovery of the 1955DDO (since I found one dealer term it simply as a 1955/1955 in the 1960 volume of said magazine). Lo and behold! In the January edition, there is an article about Mercury dimes. The title of the article is [I]"Double Die" Dimes[/I], however, throughout the article the term "doubled die" is used. At this point, I would contend that Spadone may have been trying to change a well rooted term to his own liking. I cannot seem to find any reference to the use of "double die shift" anywhere else. However, I have hardly exhausted the sources available to research the issue.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
How coin error collecting has evolved
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...