Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jackhd, post: 2238354, member: 73897&quot;]Thanks again for your input. You certainly have a bigger/better view of the need for more than one level of certification than I do. I never understood the additional grading by CAC, MAC, etc. Your point about large volume dealers is an eye-opener for me. I&#039;ve always felt that the hobby would filter out the possibility of cert + cert + cert, etc., if it wasn&#039;t useful. The companies that are tagging slabs after the major TPGs seem to be doing a lot of business and must, therefore, provide an important service. I simply didn&#039;t understand. Having said that, then where is the line drawn? At what point does the submitter say, &quot;It&#039;s been graded and certified enough, I&#039;m satisfied that the coin is properly graded?&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>SuperDave - If I understand correctly, the creation of CAC is a response to the untrustworthy grading of PCGS, and NGC? If that&#039;s the case, why not just by-pass them and go straight to CAC&nbsp; alone, where the grading is apparently more trusted? Be patient with me, I&#039;m only trying to understand. Certification isn&#039;t cheap.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in