Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jimski, post: 2669062, member: 77373&quot;]Thanks for the reply. </p><p><br /></p><p>Attached is a coin from my collection that is a type 3 (1926).&nbsp; On this coin, a part of the 2 is just barely recognizable and the 6 clear.&nbsp; A 1926 SLQ would be type 3.&nbsp; This coin supports postulate 2 (as does the 1929 from my 1st post). Postulate 2 is: on a type 3 SLQ the pedestal will wear out before the date.&nbsp;&nbsp; Note that this coin is type 3, has a date, and has no pedestal. </p><p><br /></p><p>Postulate 2 says that your coin with the 7 showing is a type 3 1927. </p><p><br /></p><p>To convince yourself that postulate 2 and 3 are true or not,</p><p><br /></p><p>-&nbsp; search SLQs on eBay and sort lowest cost first,</p><p><br /></p><p>-&nbsp; select coins where the date is almost worn off but is still recognizable so that you can determine the type. </p><p><br /></p><p>-&nbsp; Do postulates 1 and 2 hold?</p><p><br /></p><p>-&nbsp; Do type 2 SLQs with a nearly worn off date have a clear pedestal?</p><p><br /></p><p>-&nbsp; Do type 3 SLQs with a nearly worn off date have a missing pedestal?</p><p><br /></p><p>Postulate 1: on a type 2 SLQ the date will wear out before the pedestal.</p><p><br /></p><p>Postulate 2: on a type 3 SLQ the pedestal will wear out before the date.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in