Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 1293235, member: 2972&quot;]G, I understood you the first time, but thanks for the clarification.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; I will grant you that PCGS/NGC probably do worse with copper than other metals (particularly in the grey area of MA/non-MA), but they are still worlds more consistent than the average collector, in my experience.</p><p><br /></p><p>Conder,&nbsp;&nbsp; If you&#039;re suggesting using those coins and Borchart&#039;s grades to learn EAC grading, I would agree, but they were a terrible representation of TPG grading, IMO.&nbsp; The Heritage archives are a wonderful resource all new collectors should become familiar with, but focusing on the Reiver collection as a means to learn TPG grading is a mistake, IMO, as it is my opinion that collection was very optimistically graded by NGC.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in