How about another Bust Half?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by physics-fan3.14, Feb 23, 2020.

?

What does the coin grade?

  1. VF-20

  2. VF-25

  3. VF-30

  4. VF-35

  5. EF-40

  6. EF-45

  7. AU-50

  8. AU-53

  9. AU-55

  10. AU-58

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Guess the grade!
    Guess the Overton!

    (really scuffy slab, some people just don't treat them well!)

    IMG_0063.JPG IMG_0065.JPG
     
    Jaelus, ddddd and longshot like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Very nice coin . . . ordinarily an XF45, but attenuated to XF40 for some localized weakness.
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Could you explain this in a little more detail?
     
    ToughCOINS likes this.
  5. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I take it back . . . there's enough retained luster on the coin that it should easily garner a grade of XF45 for limited circulation. I misjudged the cloudy plastic of the holder for a lack of definition on the reverse of the coin, and a second look has me feeling the coin is well-enough-detailed for the XF45 grade.

    I don't know if I can change my grade selection, so I may skew the results a bit without justification.
     
    physics-fan3.14 likes this.
  6. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  7. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    XF-40 Large Date, Small Letters...Overton 107
     
  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Nice color. I went with 45.
     
  9. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I'm voting 53. In a more modern series I'd call it about a 40 to 45 but in this series the TPGs seem to me to be a bit more lenient.
     
  10. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    Torn between 45 and 50 on this one. The wear looks XF but she has AU luster. Beautiful coin
     
  11. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Weak strike typical for the variety. Gut feel was 53, but she has enough luster for 55.
     
  12. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I went AU 50...I think there is enough luster and detail to push it above XF
     
  13. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    It sure is a lovely coin but it’s not even close to AU55. I voted XF40, but could agree with XF45. I looked at a couple of O-107s but didn’t notice a particularly weak strike.
     
  14. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Gotta admit, there's a bit more spread here than I was expecting. Got guesses from 40-55.

    Keep 'em coming, I'll post results Monday evening.
     
  15. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    That flatness in the center reverse is absolutely a weak strike
     
  16. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Voting 50, I agree with @Publius2 's comments. I tend to be too low on CBH's in this range so I'm bumping it up a bit.
     
  17. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    45. Pcgs favorite grade for these without huge luster left I feel. 50 if it was a leinient day
     
  18. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

    Yes, of course it is. But you said “weak strike, typical for the variety”. So I’ve looked at other XF/AU examples of the O-107 and they didn’t show such a weak strike. Below O-107 was graded AU55 and it’s clearly a higher grade than the coin featured in this thread.

    DE3AB6D6-C0BC-41DB-9552-E9EBE8C8F236.jpeg
    E8DF55DE-8C37-48FB-B83B-E234A6215441.jpeg
     
  19. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    In general, 107s tend to be among the best struck DMs for the year. Still, many (such as this one) are poorly stuck.
     
    micbraun likes this.
  20. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    The one you posted has the exact same weakness in the center reverse.

    Perhaps it was net graded downward for the distracting digs and scrape on the obverse and scratch on the reverse? Or did you miss that too?
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2020
  21. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    As I said, I like this coin better as a 53. But, according to PCGS, not all 55s are created equal, hence my comment.

    All three of these graded AU-55. If you don’t believe me, they are proudly displayed on PCGS CoinFacts.

    D263E0CD-98B7-44BF-BDFE-DC3211660B18.jpeg
    4803E43D-7D88-45BC-B31F-BB41D54A6435.jpeg
    A1EE1A8E-FB7D-42AF-B41B-4D430E44E698.jpeg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page