Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 931724, member: 15199&quot;]<p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Your assumption. I do not agree with any of the above, except I do not know about the &quot;drying up&quot; part.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">I do have a very hard time thinking that one might use these coins as a basis to say that somehow the mint has regressed to pre 1996 and abandoned the single squeeze die manufacture and just for this coin went back to the older method of hubbing, annealing, and hubbing again , not just with one master, but with 2 different ones with different size lettering, which I must admit I do not see. I am sticking with MD. I understand your enthusiasm and such, but I think it has gone a little beyond reality, IMO. No offense intended, just to make sure my objections are noted. Good Luck.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Jim </span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in