Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 221161, member: 2972&quot;]Fair enough.&nbsp; I&#039;ll even give you a chance to win me over -- simply show me another example of a coin that shows this wear pattern.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>That said, might I win you over if I showed you several MS examples with weakness in this area that could not be caused by wear? </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.heritagecoin.com/images/NewNames/75/2/6/5/265858.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.heritagecoin.com/images/NewNames/75/1/2/6/126632.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://images.heritagecoin.com/images/HNAI/75/320/320001698r.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>As stated above I suggest it&#039;s a weak strike due to the high point on the other side being the legs of seated Liberty (in the case of the shield weakness), and weakness in this area is not uncommon.&nbsp; That&#039;s not to say there&#039;s not wear on this area, but the flatness you describe is mostly due to the weak strike centrally on the reverse, which is virtually identical to the third photo above...Mike[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in