Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2624823, member: 36230&quot;]I&#039;m not denying what was said, but am saying that without proper context, it muddies his point while coming off as rather petty and infinitely one sided. Although it still would have been cherrypicking, I would have much rather seen examples given of NGC performance for the exact same coins and grades over the same period. Yes, I can do this on my own, of course, but should I really have to? In my opinion no, I shouldn&#039;t, nor should anyone else and is why I added the part about having grown tired of mostly meaningless finger-pointing about how bad the other guy is all while no evidence of how good the one making the claim supposedly is. NGC is clearly implying they&#039;re better and that their coins have not suffered the same as select PCGS coins have, so why not make a proper case instead of relying on said implications? If NGC is truly outperforming or at least not suffering the same as PCGS is, they&#039;d be much better served by simply presenting the proper evidence, with equal comparisons (as is possible), and even giving examples of where PCGS coins have preformed better. The fact they didn&#039;t suggests there&#039;s less meat to this bone than is implied.</p><p><br /></p><p>My point and views on this approach are in no way meant to be pro-PCGS. If PCGS presented the same argument against select NGC coins in the same manner, I would see it no differently. The proof is in the pudding and as it stands we&#039;ve little more than an empty, or at least a half-eaten container.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in