Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Hmmm. I REALLY messed up in reverse - AGAIN!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Alegandron, post: 2997839, member: 51347"]<b><i>Wow, capturing a Roman Denarius has been pretty elusive!</i></b></p><p><br /></p><p>During the War with Hannibal or the 2nd Punic War, Rome had been decimated in three major battles of <i>Trebia, Trasemine, and Cannae</i> within an 18 month period during Dec-218 through Aug-216 BCE. Roman casualties at the hand of the Cartheginians were catastrophic for Rome with estimated combined deaths and captured of upwards of 150,000 - <i>mostly killed</i>.* This would INCLUDE both Itallian Allies and Roman Legions. However, this MASSIVE loss of Soldiers is dramatically illustrated in the population graph below. All are estimates, but the RELATIVE change in Rome's population is dramatic! (see estimated population below)**</p><p><br /></p><p>Consequently, Rome was RUNNING OUT OF MONEY! The ORIGINAL Silver Denarius*** or commonly known as the Roman Didrachm or later the Quadrigatus from the 3rd Century BCE were twice as heavy as the common Denarius of Rome after the reforms of 212/211 BCE. They were basically the equivelent of the Carthage Shekel or Magna Graecia Didrachm in size. During this period of the 3rd Century BCE, these were actually called Denarius / Denarii by the Romans as they were 10-As units.***</p><p><br /></p><p><i><b>I have been wanting to get a Roman Republic AR Denarius from the Crawford 44/5 series for some time. This is an early version / first version of the AR Denarius and other AR coins issued in Rome as the New Denarius Reform. </b></i></p><p><br /></p><p>Well, JUST won this little guy in a recent auction, KINDA suspecting it was NOT the elusive Crawford 44/5 AR Denarius...</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]740961[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><i><b>Yup! I messed up in REVERSE again</b>... suspecting it was NOT the elusive (to me) Crawford 44/5... Chatted with [USER=74282]@red_spork[/USER] after my capture, and he confirmed that I got ANOTHER Rare Crawford 68/1b Sicily issue AR Denarius.</i></p><p> </p><p>Checking with Wildwinds, they had no 68/1b; CNG Research only has one 68/1b; and ACSearch only has three 68/1b - one of which is the one sold in CNG.</p><p><br /></p><p>In my posting of my "original" First Denarius of the Reform 212/211, I was corrected. I had actually captured a more RARE issue from Sicily...</p><p>[ATTACH=full]740960[/ATTACH]</p><p>RR Anon AR denarius Roma 211-206 BCE ROMA incus Dioscuri single horn-helmet Sear37; Crawford 68/1b SICILY ISSUE RARE was originally attributed as Crawford 44/5</p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610</a></p><p><br /></p><p>And my Crawford 44/ series:</p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610">https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610</a></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">[I want to say a <b>BIG THANK YOU to [USER=74282]@red_spork[/USER]</b> who has helped me as well as cover my back as I fumble around collecting the Roman Republic coins! I LOVE the History, I am just not a Numismatist!]</span></p><p><br /></p><p><b><i>So NOW, I have TWO mess-up Denarii (Crawford 68/1b) that are actually more RARE than my TARGET Crawford 44/5 coins! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></i></b></p><p><br /></p><p><b><i><font size="6"><span style="color: #b30000">FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR COOL DENARII !!! OR ANY COOL COIN STORIES and/or COINS!</span></font></i></b></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>* Wikipedia: Battle of Trebia; Battle of Trasimene; Battle of Cannae</i></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]740963[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>**"Roman population counts Modern controversy about Roman population size stems from the fact that surviving tallies, if taken at face value (i.e., if thought to refer to same reference group), are impossible to reconcile with one another. The basic problems have been set out at great length many times before and need not be recounted here in detail.2 To summarize very briefly, Roman sources dating from the first century BCE to the fourth century CE but presumably drawing on earlier records, report citizen head counts for 25 different occasions from the beginning of the third century BCE to the end of the second century BCE. Unamended, these totals range from 137,000 to 395,000 registered individuals. ..." **</p><p>[ATTACH=full]740955[/ATTACH]</p><p><i>**Roman population size: the logic of the debate Version 2.0 July 2007 Walter Scheidel Stanford University</i></p><p><i><a href="https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/070706.pdf" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/070706.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/070706.pdf</a></i></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]740964[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>***<i>Coinage of the Roman Economy, 300 B.C. to A.D. 700, Harl, Kenneth W.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>One of my Denarius / Didrachm during this period...</p><p>[ATTACH=full]740966[/ATTACH]</p><p>Approx 8+g: Roman Republic Anonymous AR Denarius / Didrachm 280-275 BCE Mars-Horse FIRST AR Coin of Rome!</p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i><b><i><span style="color: #b30000"><font size="6">FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR COOL DENARII !!! OR ANY COOL COIN STORES / COINS!</font></span></i></b></i></p><p><i></i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Alegandron, post: 2997839, member: 51347"][B][I]Wow, capturing a Roman Denarius has been pretty elusive![/I][/B] During the War with Hannibal or the 2nd Punic War, Rome had been decimated in three major battles of [I]Trebia, Trasemine, and Cannae[/I] within an 18 month period during Dec-218 through Aug-216 BCE. Roman casualties at the hand of the Cartheginians were catastrophic for Rome with estimated combined deaths and captured of upwards of 150,000 - [I]mostly killed[/I].* This would INCLUDE both Itallian Allies and Roman Legions. However, this MASSIVE loss of Soldiers is dramatically illustrated in the population graph below. All are estimates, but the RELATIVE change in Rome's population is dramatic! (see estimated population below)** Consequently, Rome was RUNNING OUT OF MONEY! The ORIGINAL Silver Denarius*** or commonly known as the Roman Didrachm or later the Quadrigatus from the 3rd Century BCE were twice as heavy as the common Denarius of Rome after the reforms of 212/211 BCE. They were basically the equivelent of the Carthage Shekel or Magna Graecia Didrachm in size. During this period of the 3rd Century BCE, these were actually called Denarius / Denarii by the Romans as they were 10-As units.*** [I][B]I have been wanting to get a Roman Republic AR Denarius from the Crawford 44/5 series for some time. This is an early version / first version of the AR Denarius and other AR coins issued in Rome as the New Denarius Reform. [/B][/I] Well, JUST won this little guy in a recent auction, KINDA suspecting it was NOT the elusive Crawford 44/5 AR Denarius... [ATTACH=full]740961[/ATTACH] [I][B]Yup! I messed up in REVERSE again[/B]... suspecting it was NOT the elusive (to me) Crawford 44/5... Chatted with [USER=74282]@red_spork[/USER] after my capture, and he confirmed that I got ANOTHER Rare Crawford 68/1b Sicily issue AR Denarius.[/I] Checking with Wildwinds, they had no 68/1b; CNG Research only has one 68/1b; and ACSearch only has three 68/1b - one of which is the one sold in CNG. In my posting of my "original" First Denarius of the Reform 212/211, I was corrected. I had actually captured a more RARE issue from Sicily... [ATTACH=full]740960[/ATTACH] RR Anon AR denarius Roma 211-206 BCE ROMA incus Dioscuri single horn-helmet Sear37; Crawford 68/1b SICILY ISSUE RARE was originally attributed as Crawford 44/5 [url]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610[/url] And my Crawford 44/ series: [url]https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-story-of-the-coin-struck-to-fight-hannibal-the-first-denarius-and-its-influence.300387/#post-2807610[/url] [COLOR=#0000ff][I want to say a [B]BIG THANK YOU to [USER=74282]@red_spork[/USER][/B] who has helped me as well as cover my back as I fumble around collecting the Roman Republic coins! I LOVE the History, I am just not a Numismatist!][/COLOR] [B][I]So NOW, I have TWO mess-up Denarii (Crawford 68/1b) that are actually more RARE than my TARGET Crawford 44/5 coins! :D :D :D[/I][/B] [B][I][SIZE=6][COLOR=#b30000]FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR COOL DENARII !!! OR ANY COOL COIN STORIES and/or COINS![/COLOR][/SIZE][/I][/B] [I] * Wikipedia: Battle of Trebia; Battle of Trasimene; Battle of Cannae[/I] [ATTACH=full]740963[/ATTACH] **"Roman population counts Modern controversy about Roman population size stems from the fact that surviving tallies, if taken at face value (i.e., if thought to refer to same reference group), are impossible to reconcile with one another. The basic problems have been set out at great length many times before and need not be recounted here in detail.2 To summarize very briefly, Roman sources dating from the first century BCE to the fourth century CE but presumably drawing on earlier records, report citizen head counts for 25 different occasions from the beginning of the third century BCE to the end of the second century BCE. Unamended, these totals range from 137,000 to 395,000 registered individuals. ..." ** [ATTACH=full]740955[/ATTACH] [I]**Roman population size: the logic of the debate Version 2.0 July 2007 Walter Scheidel Stanford University [url]https://www.princeton.edu/~pswpc/pdfs/scheidel/070706.pdf[/url][/I] [ATTACH=full]740964[/ATTACH] ***[I]Coinage of the Roman Economy, 300 B.C. to A.D. 700, Harl, Kenneth W.[/I] One of my Denarius / Didrachm during this period... [ATTACH=full]740966[/ATTACH] Approx 8+g: Roman Republic Anonymous AR Denarius / Didrachm 280-275 BCE Mars-Horse FIRST AR Coin of Rome! [I] [B][I][COLOR=#b30000][SIZE=6]FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR COOL DENARII !!! OR ANY COOL COIN STORES / COINS![/SIZE][/COLOR][/I][/B] [/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Hmmm. I REALLY messed up in reverse - AGAIN!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...