Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Randy Abercrombie, post: 24673921, member: 92655&quot;]I’m one that typically speaks positively towards people’s personal coin reviews. Forgive me if this sounds a bit harsh.</p><p><br /></p><p>Im not a dedicated error collector though I do own high quality examples of the 55 doubled die cent, 42/41 Merc among others….. I’m old and can no longer make out a mintmark without a loupe however I do not require magnification to enjoy my error coins which leads me at simply ask….. If that much magnification is required, what difference does it really make?</p><p><br /></p><p>These planchets are subjected incredible pressures when they are struck. Metal moves and flows. It is precisely the reason that the luster is different from one coin to the next.</p><p><br /></p><p>And think about this logically. What on earth could the US mint hope to accomplish by hiding an image within a 1/8” space?</p><p><br /></p><p>I see nothing other than the same flow lines that can be found every coins surface.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in