Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 2017208, member: 27832&quot;]One of my two sets is going back today. That set includes the reverse proof with gunk on the chin, the regular proof with debris on the obverse field and a cracked capsule, and the enhanced uncirculated with pronounced hairlines across the reverse field and &quot;stripes&quot; across the obverse portrait. I&#039;ll try to post pictures later.</p><p><br /></p><p>There was a WORLD of difference between the two enhanced-unc coins I got. I was willing to believe the &quot;scratches&quot; were just part of the finish, but one coin showed them prominently, and one barely showed them at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>The standard-uncirculated coins were both pretty nice.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m still thinking of trying my luck with more sets. I really like the look of these (except for the reverse proof, but that&#039;s just me), and I have reason to expect that I can get them with reasonable quality. (1 for 2 is much better than the 0 for 5 I saw with the gold proofs.)</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, I agree with [USER=42727]@jpcienkus[/USER] -- the packaging is really disappointing. But I really don&#039;t care much about the packaging. The gold proof packaging was pretty nice; I didn&#039;t care about that, either.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in