Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Heritage's photos vs. the coins in hand
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="oval_man, post: 2722227, member: 22602"]I went for the first time to an HA auction preview, at Central States going on now. I was anxious to compare a varied list of coins I have been following on their website to those in hand to see what insights I might gain about the accuracy of their photography in general.</p><p><br /></p><p>HA takes great photos and my experience at the preview bore this out. I think they make a concerted effort to portray each coin to its best advantage while exposing any potentially problematic flaws<i>.</i> As I think any photographer would agree, it's often a tricky balancing act. (The coins I've won from their auctions have all equaled or, in some cases, even surpassed their photos with the exception of one.)</p><p><br /></p><p>In this auction, I've been following an 1861 IHC MS 65 which looks great in photos but proved problematic in hand. It's not CAC'd, which was a red flag for me because I know Heritage encourages sellers to submit their better coins. (I auctioned coins through HA once; four of the five received the bean and I was very pleased with the auction results because of this).</p><p><br /></p><p>Upon seeing this '61 IHC in hand I knew exactly why it hadn't CAC'd: there are three parallel scratches on Liberty's face that do not show in the photo. I happened to show the coin to a seasoned dealer sitting next to me who, coincidentally, knows John Albanese well and said this coin would never pass.</p><p><br /></p><p>These scratches, while clearly evident under the right angle, took me a while to find; in fairness, it's very possible the HA photographers simply overlooked them. But they definitely compromise the coin's grade and appeal.</p><p><br /></p><p>Someone is going to win this coin and likely be very disappointed when they receive it. (The scratches are parallel with those in front of Liberty's eye. They are not as severe but expose fresh copper and thus are very noticeable at the right angle.)</p><p><a href="https://coins.ha.com/itm/indian-cents/small-cents/1861-1c-ms65-pcgs/a/1254-3493.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://coins.ha.com/itm/indian-cents/small-cents/1861-1c-ms65-pcgs/a/1254-3493.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515" rel="nofollow">https://coins.ha.com/itm/indian-cents/small-cents/1861-1c-ms65-pcgs/a/1254-3493.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="oval_man, post: 2722227, member: 22602"]I went for the first time to an HA auction preview, at Central States going on now. I was anxious to compare a varied list of coins I have been following on their website to those in hand to see what insights I might gain about the accuracy of their photography in general. HA takes great photos and my experience at the preview bore this out. I think they make a concerted effort to portray each coin to its best advantage while exposing any potentially problematic flaws[I].[/I] As I think any photographer would agree, it's often a tricky balancing act. (The coins I've won from their auctions have all equaled or, in some cases, even surpassed their photos with the exception of one.) In this auction, I've been following an 1861 IHC MS 65 which looks great in photos but proved problematic in hand. It's not CAC'd, which was a red flag for me because I know Heritage encourages sellers to submit their better coins. (I auctioned coins through HA once; four of the five received the bean and I was very pleased with the auction results because of this). Upon seeing this '61 IHC in hand I knew exactly why it hadn't CAC'd: there are three parallel scratches on Liberty's face that do not show in the photo. I happened to show the coin to a seasoned dealer sitting next to me who, coincidentally, knows John Albanese well and said this coin would never pass. These scratches, while clearly evident under the right angle, took me a while to find; in fairness, it's very possible the HA photographers simply overlooked them. But they definitely compromise the coin's grade and appeal. Someone is going to win this coin and likely be very disappointed when they receive it. (The scratches are parallel with those in front of Liberty's eye. They are not as severe but expose fresh copper and thus are very noticeable at the right angle.) [url]https://coins.ha.com/itm/indian-cents/small-cents/1861-1c-ms65-pcgs/a/1254-3493.s?ic4=ListView-ShortDescription-071515[/url][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Heritage's photos vs. the coins in hand
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...