Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 922390, member: 112&quot;]Looking at it from an overall perspective I think the pics have gotten consistently better over the years. My opinion of the recent change is no different.</p><p><br /></p><p>To me details are what you <u>need</u> to see. If you are going to interpret something then it is much easier to interpret luster than it is to interpret details. That is because if details are not shown then they just aren&#039;t shown and you have no idea of what is there.</p><p><br /></p><p>Details are what makes you or breaks you when it comes to telling if a coin is graded accurately or not. That&#039;s because if the luster is all there or not, if the details are missing or you just can&#039;t see them then you have no idea of how many contact marks a coin has or doesn&#039;t have or their severity. You don&#039;t know if key strike details are missing or not. You can&#039;t see hairlines, you can&#039;t see light scratches, you can&#039;t see light wear - in short you can&#039;t see a lot of stuff.</p><p><br /></p><p>So show me the details, and I&#039;ll interpret the luster.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in