Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2474764, member: 22331&quot;]I&#039;m assuming that you&#039;ve a reasonable understanding of Heritages antics, although your posts indicate NOT.</p><p><br /></p><p>In order to implement a violation of our states/federal legislation, I had to properly respond as an &quot;uninformed&quot; trusting client to their dishonorable promises.</p><p><br /></p><p>I complied in all respects to lies/promises (well documented) by an &quot;officer&quot; of their firm, until they reneged, requesting that I trust them by sending a considerable 5 figure lot to their out-state location. I knew that based on numerous factors, we had a probable case, and didn&#039;t forward my possessions which were understood to be personally appraised in my locale by the officer, receipted, and taken for consignment.</p><p><br /></p><p>This well documented transaction was reported on this site as a warning to others, possibly more trusting, not having had past adverse dealings with this firm. I don&#039;t understand why they still send documents to me, and have recently allowed bidding by myself, when they openly state that they will not deliver to my locale.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe that this action is a prelude to future efforts, curtailing possibly adjudged dishonorable inter-state transactions.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe a caveat to the aforementioned information is: <font size="5"><b>caveat venditor and </b><b>caveat emptor</b></font></p><p><br /></p><p>Dishonorable transactions/discourse appear to be a normal process for business/politics?, often found to be undesirable, but legal.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in