Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 2462583, member: 71723&quot;]I&#039;m not a member of any state&#039;s bar, but I have tried about 20 cases pro se, and I&#039;ve learned how to read legalese. As a legislative Research Analyst, I need to. My OPINION in this case is that Stiel feels, with some degree of justification IMO, that the way Heritage handled his material, which sounds to me to be common knowledge as SOP, was more designed to enrich them as opposed to him.</p><p><br /></p><p>All three of the next statements could be true at the same time:</p><p>1) It just seems shady.</p><p>2) He may be right that they don&#039;t put the consignor&#039;s interests above their own.</p><p>3) It&#039;s right there in the contract and he signed it.</p><p><br /></p><p>The auction house&#039;s business model is to make money for them. If you make money too, everyone smiles and goes home happy. &quot;He&#039;s not the client, he&#039;s the product.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in