Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bahabully, post: 1074787, member: 17555&quot;]The pcgs sample you provide has two distinct things over the HA sample:</p><p>1 - strike</p><p>2 - lack of hits </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>... I would be surprised if the HA sample upgraded based on luster alone give the distractions on the cheek (a primary focal point), the notable ding on the reverse, and that the strike is not compatable with the sample you&#039;ve shown...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>then again,, who knows,, maybe the buyer knows someone in pcgs or ngc and has already been provided an opinion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in