Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="iGradeMS70, post: 1651839, member: 29109"]What? Who's debating? And what "technical merit" are you referring to? True, but this isn't a factor in the coins' luster. This is a proven fact? Can you provide me with your source of this information?...   I'm lost... I thought you said no Peace Dollars were lustrous? You're the one who asked for my opinion. But you can rest assured this will be the last time I offer it in any thread you create. Again, what? The shot showed what the coin will look like in-hand. Your "refined" shot is a joke. You don't see luster because it's not there. Nah, it's really not that hard. Here are just a few photos I've taken that emphasize both luster and color, without under-exposing the coins to light. [ATTACH]240968.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]240983.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]240978.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]240982.vB[/ATTACH] Again, your altered photo is pure comedy. The coin will not look like that in hand. You haven't even seen the coin in hand, so how can you even have an idea of the coin's true luster (or lack there of)? That is far from realistic But you just said 1921 Peace Dollars aren't lustrous coins? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]