Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Help!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="acanthite, post: 407703, member: 6647"]The coins appearing to be silver was the 800 lb gorilla I didn't think about until after logging off yesterday. Aside from that, I wanted to address Doug's assertion regarding the copper issues from Mexico:</p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>I did read this in Menzel (which is in turn a quote from Pradeau's <i>Historia numismatica)</i>:</p><p> </p><p>"Mendoza realized that daily life for the general population required coins of lesser value than the 1/4 and 1/2 real pieces then in circulation. He duly promoted the coining of 2- and 4-maravedies copper pieces as the solution in 1536 or early 1537. But the copper coins were rejected by the general population, especially the Indians, with considerable distain; and the mintage was discontinued by 1538."</p><p> </p><p>So Menzel does show several varieties of the 4 maravedies before the 1538 decree, but does mention that there are no known 2 maravedies from this period in existence. If the Indians rejected the copper coins, they must have been circulating. </p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>I can't disagree with any of that, Doug knows much more about these coins than I do.</p><p> </p><p>Assuming they are not fakes, I wonder if it is possible that some experimentation in debased silver was conducted for these pieces in the late 1530's, considering how difficult is was to get the local populace to accept copper. I do not know of a reference to back that wild assertion, however.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="acanthite, post: 407703, member: 6647"]The coins appearing to be silver was the 800 lb gorilla I didn't think about until after logging off yesterday. Aside from that, I wanted to address Doug's assertion regarding the copper issues from Mexico: I did read this in Menzel (which is in turn a quote from Pradeau's [I]Historia numismatica)[/I]: "Mendoza realized that daily life for the general population required coins of lesser value than the 1/4 and 1/2 real pieces then in circulation. He duly promoted the coining of 2- and 4-maravedies copper pieces as the solution in 1536 or early 1537. But the copper coins were rejected by the general population, especially the Indians, with considerable distain; and the mintage was discontinued by 1538." So Menzel does show several varieties of the 4 maravedies before the 1538 decree, but does mention that there are no known 2 maravedies from this period in existence. If the Indians rejected the copper coins, they must have been circulating. I can't disagree with any of that, Doug knows much more about these coins than I do. Assuming they are not fakes, I wonder if it is possible that some experimentation in debased silver was conducted for these pieces in the late 1530's, considering how difficult is was to get the local populace to accept copper. I do not know of a reference to back that wild assertion, however.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Help!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...