Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;foundinrolls, post: 102630, member: 4350&quot;]Hi,</p><p>What I see on the 2003 could also be die doubling.&nbsp; You do not get that distinct separation between images as is seen on both of the Sacs in question. The IN WE is mechanical doubling and is common on proofs.&nbsp; What is going on with the designer&#039;s initials is more than Mechanical doubling.&nbsp; keep in mind that you can have both mechanical doubling and die doubling on the same coin.&nbsp; There is absolutely no way that I know of to have a &quot;bounce&quot; that does not destroy the metal around the area of the strike. The relief makes no difference with respect to the kind of seperation of the images as seen here.&nbsp; I&#039;m sticking to my opinion that it is die doubling.</p><p>Bill[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in