Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Help Needed from CoinTalk Members
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 3288611, member: 98537"]Hello Al Kowsky and happy new year to everyone,</p><p><br /></p><p>these Karolus the 6th ' écus d'or don't characterize my specification domain, but I know according to Duplessy that the first issue with distinguished mints (in fact, the third issue) is dated 1389-09-11.</p><p><br /></p><p>The first issue of the Karolus the 6th ' écus d'or are dated 1385-03-11, present no secret point (under a letter or beginning cross of the legend). That's the case here.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second one (1388-02-28) is just distinguished by the weight, but the difference is so tiny, nor considering the fabrication's tolerance, that it's impossible to differentiate them : 4,079g for the first issue / 3,990g for the second.</p><p><br /></p><p>The experts of the period who have noticed constant characteristics of specific mints, try to attribute mints to the undated coins of the period 1385-1389.</p><p><br /></p><p>You can see a clear point after the second R of FRANCORVM. I've never read anything about this particularity. I hope someone actually or further will be more precise.</p><p><br /></p><p>Best wishes.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Aestimare, post: 3288611, member: 98537"]Hello Al Kowsky and happy new year to everyone, these Karolus the 6th ' écus d'or don't characterize my specification domain, but I know according to Duplessy that the first issue with distinguished mints (in fact, the third issue) is dated 1389-09-11. The first issue of the Karolus the 6th ' écus d'or are dated 1385-03-11, present no secret point (under a letter or beginning cross of the legend). That's the case here. The second one (1388-02-28) is just distinguished by the weight, but the difference is so tiny, nor considering the fabrication's tolerance, that it's impossible to differentiate them : 4,079g for the first issue / 3,990g for the second. The experts of the period who have noticed constant characteristics of specific mints, try to attribute mints to the undated coins of the period 1385-1389. You can see a clear point after the second R of FRANCORVM. I've never read anything about this particularity. I hope someone actually or further will be more precise. Best wishes.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Help Needed from CoinTalk Members
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...