Help me with the logic of lowball coins

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by NIBBS, Jul 11, 2018.

  1. NumisNinja

    NumisNinja Active Member

    As long as the process used to artificially wear down a coin only involved wearing down the coin, then I don't know how that could be distinguishable from authentic wear. I mean if you try to AT the coin after, then I could see how they'd know.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    But you wan the one that CAC declined to sticker, that would indicate that it was low end for the Poor-1 grade.
     
  4. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    So this is one of those times when it's BETTER NOT to have a Green Bean.
     
  5. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I think Bill Fivaz was one of the first to try to put together a lowball type set. He has a lot of certified P-01 and FR-02 type coins in a box labelled “World’s Worst Type Set”. This was years before lowball collecting became a thing
     
  6. EyeAppealingCoins

    EyeAppealingCoins Well-Known Member

    Some people like a challenge. I don't subscribe to that school of thought either.
     
  7. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    I knew collectors that were trying to put together "The Worlds Worst Type Set" years before the grading services even came into existance. So lowballers have been around at least 50 years. It just wasn't publicly well known until the Registry sets came about.
     
    TypeCoin971793 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page