Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JPeace$, post: 1841333, member: 42727&quot;]I&#039;m not trying to be critical of your coins.&nbsp; I collect this series and spend a lot of time viewing photos on eBay, Heritage, Stacks, Legend Morphy, David Lawrence, NE Numismatics and any other place I can view coins.&nbsp; I own many 65&#039;s, 66&#039;s and a couple 67&#039;s.&nbsp; I have DPL&#039;s as well as some PL&#039;s.&nbsp; I&#039;m just starting to get comfortable with purchasing toned Morgan&#039;s solely from photos.&nbsp; I do not consider myself an expert either.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I have seen many coins in holders that I just pass on because I don&#039;t agree with the grade.&nbsp; You should be very happy with the 1900-O.&nbsp; That&#039;s a really nice MS64 and the fields look to be semi-PL as well.&nbsp; I just don&#039;t agree with the MS66.&nbsp; The biggest mis-graded Morgan are the ones in GSA Holders.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know the thinking behind and I really like NGC&#039;s grading of Morgans.&nbsp; They&#039;re not perfect by any stretch, but I think they do a better job on DPL and PL designations in this series vs. PCGS.&nbsp; I own Morgans in both holders though, because I like to think I buy the coin, not the holder.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I&#039;ll be curious to hear your thoughts.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in