Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JPeace$, post: 1841317, member: 42727&quot;]1900-O:&nbsp; I think is above average for the grade.&nbsp; IMO, this one should have the green bean.&nbsp; Very nice MS64!</p><ul> <li>Breaks in the fields from 9:30 - 10:30</li> <li>Distracting mark above the eye</li> <li>Cheek is pretty clean, with only one slight ding (tough to see more from the pic)</li> <li>Strike is good, but still not complete.&nbsp; Hair above ear is average</li> <li>Reverse: Mark on the eagles head</li> <li>Reverse: field marks on between body and eagles left wing</li> <li>I can see the semi-PL on obverse and reverse</li> </ul><p>1880-S:&nbsp; I think this one is overgraded and can&#039;t believe they gave it a green bean</p><ul> <li>Way too many hits on the cheek for a 66.&nbsp; The 64 has a much better cheek and this is the main focal point on the obverse</li> <li>Clear die polish lines on the obverse and strong fields on the reverse as well.</li> <li>I&#039;ll bet this has a lot of luster in-hand and could almost be PL.</li> <li>Hard to tell more from the picture.&nbsp; It looks as if there is a slight luster break on the obverse at 5, put with PL pictures, that mark could be misleading.</li> </ul><p>I can&#039;t explain why the 80-S got the grade it did.&nbsp; Who graded it:&nbsp; NGC or PCGS?&nbsp; Not saying that has any difference as I&#039;ve seen improperly graded coins in both holders.&nbsp; I&#039;m just curious.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in