Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 24567230, member: 37839&quot;]1880s, 1881s, and 1882s had better have considerable cameo effect from the die polish in order to get a PL designation in a new or fairly new holder by either PCGS or NGC.&nbsp; Those dates need to actually look like a proof coin, have incredible luster, and a hammered strike as well.&nbsp; For DMPL for early San Francisco mint coins, expect it to look like an Ucam coin in terms of contrast.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a recently certified&nbsp; DMPL, 1881s, graded MS 66.&nbsp; It looks more like a real proof Morgan.&nbsp; It is not my coin, but is up for sale for 3 grand.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1557524[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in