Help from my Trade $ Friends here! 1878-S- Live or memorex?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, May 25, 2023.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    A friend sent me the following images and note:

    "I'm a part time dealer in New England and a while back we picked up an 1877-S trade dollar from another dealer. Nothing seemed too out of sort with it, until yesterday. We were at a show and a friend of ours showed us a new metal analysis tester he picked up. We put several genuine silver dollars on it to see how it worked, as well as a known counterfeit. Then we put the trade dollar I mentioned on it and it came back as not 90% silver. Everything else checks out - magnet test, weight, diameter, design, etc"...

    obv1.jpg

    rev1.jpg

    With different color filter:

    obv2.jpg

    rev2.jpg

    edges.jpg

    Thanks, Jack.
     
    lardan, Heavymetal and Mr.Q like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Yup, NOPE!
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  4. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Another one bites the dust. You're back from Europe I see, well okay!
     
  5. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    No way to tell from those images.
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  6. mbogoman

    mbogoman Active Member

    From the images, it looks good to me, albeit scrubbed.
     
  7. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    you said 'Not 90% silver".

    What percentage did it show?
     
    KBBPLL likes this.
  8. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    Honestly, to me it looks genuine, if Brillo'd.
     
  9. Vertigo

    Vertigo Did someone say bust?

    Isn't there another non magnetic metal that weighs the same that they were using? I could swear I read about it somewhere.
     
  10. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Enought about magnets! From what I've seen on the Internet and in hand, anything attracted by a magnet is not going to look even close to a genuine coin!
     
    micbraun and Jack D. Young like this.
  11. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    You may be thinking of tungsten, used to fake gold coins and bars, as it has almost identical atomic weight and is not magnetic.
     
  12. micbraun

    micbraun coindiccted

  13. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Simply my "gut feeling" at first view. Fake looking, but what do I know?
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  14. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Well, you could presumably alloy heavier and lighter metals to get an exact match -- and then it would have such different electromagnetic characteristics that it would fail immediately on something like a Sigma.

    The last couple I got were apparently silver-plated copper, which I still think might fool a Sigma, but makes the coin about 10% thicker to hit the desired weight.
     
    micbraun likes this.
  15. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Properly alloying substituted metals which are more and less dense to arrive at the same net density as the 90% silver coinage would not deliver a coin any different dimensionally than that one desires to produce.
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  16. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    I believe you reference tungsten as being substantially equivalent to the density of gold, not silver.
     
    Insider and Vertigo like this.
  17. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I did say gold.
     
    Insider likes this.
  18. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Whoops, so you did. I obviously had context of the thread in mind, and failed to digest all that you wrote.

    Sorry.
     
  19. Vertigo

    Vertigo Did someone say bust?

    Yes that's probably what it was i read somewhere. I couldn't recall what or when I even read that.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page