Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Help for an article
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8163719, member: 24314"]At one time the ANA used "Choice" and "Typical" to identify coins in the top or bottom of a grade. A choice coin had fewer marks than a typical coin. The combined the amount of wear and the number of marks. Later, they corrected this confusing mistake. I started preaching how stupid this was for years because a baggy coin that had an AU-59 amount of wear could not be considered "choice" (very few detracting marks). Therefore it was a Typical AU (AU-50-53).</p><p><br /></p><p>I am extremely pleased that today the amount of wear on a coin has been made a major determination of the circulated grades. So we have come full circle. </p><p><br /></p><p>News Flash: Modern "detail" grading is exactly what was done way back in 1972 using the "Technical Grading System" I developed to ID coins for internal record keeping and then at the first TPGS - INSAB. Additionally, commercial grading of circulated coins has evolved to be more focused on the actual amount of wear. That was obvious to us in 1972. <b>Straight grades for MS coins depends on several factors such as luster and marks. A circulated straight grade depends on the amount of wear. </b></p><p><br /></p><p>The ANA had the chance to do exactly this at least a year before they had the "experts" write a grading guide. They did not. The <b>big problem</b> with the true Technical Grading System was that <b><span style="color: #b30000">a coin's value was of no consequence.</span></b> <span style="color: #b30000">It was designed only to determine a coin's condition of preservation from the time it was struck and to ID it (along with weight and photo of both sides) if it were ever lost. </span> <b>It did not work at all in the commercial market </b>where lustrous, mark free sliders (AU) were sold as MS-65 gems. It was NOT practiced at the ANA's service in CO. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 8163719, member: 24314"]At one time the ANA used "Choice" and "Typical" to identify coins in the top or bottom of a grade. A choice coin had fewer marks than a typical coin. The combined the amount of wear and the number of marks. Later, they corrected this confusing mistake. I started preaching how stupid this was for years because a baggy coin that had an AU-59 amount of wear could not be considered "choice" (very few detracting marks). Therefore it was a Typical AU (AU-50-53). I am extremely pleased that today the amount of wear on a coin has been made a major determination of the circulated grades. So we have come full circle. News Flash: Modern "detail" grading is exactly what was done way back in 1972 using the "Technical Grading System" I developed to ID coins for internal record keeping and then at the first TPGS - INSAB. Additionally, commercial grading of circulated coins has evolved to be more focused on the actual amount of wear. That was obvious to us in 1972. [B]Straight grades for MS coins depends on several factors such as luster and marks. A circulated straight grade depends on the amount of wear. [/B] The ANA had the chance to do exactly this at least a year before they had the "experts" write a grading guide. They did not. The [B]big problem[/B] with the true Technical Grading System was that [B][COLOR=#b30000]a coin's value was of no consequence.[/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=#b30000]It was designed only to determine a coin's condition of preservation from the time it was struck and to ID it (along with weight and photo of both sides) if it were ever lost. [/COLOR] [B]It did not work at all in the commercial market [/B]where lustrous, mark free sliders (AU) were sold as MS-65 gems. It was NOT practiced at the ANA's service in CO. :p[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Help for an article
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...