Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lrbguy, post: 3084747, member: 88829&quot;]@<font size="4"><b>maridvnvm </b></font>Thanks for putting up that coin from Trier, Martin, it is from the first series in 324-325, and I don&#039;t yet have an example.&nbsp; The coin from Constantinople is more of a mystery, since Constantinople had only one series for these, from two officinae and an example for each is shown.&nbsp; Now I&#039;m curious to see if officina A also has this more basic hairstyle as well, or is it confined to B.&nbsp; Stay tuned.</p><p><br /></p><p>@RomanCollector&nbsp; Another interesting variant.&nbsp; Since only series two used the three letter mintmark, this has to be a variant of that design plan.&nbsp; But what was the prime version and what was the variant?&nbsp; Stay tuned, we need to see more.&nbsp; Thanks for showing it.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=44132]@Bing[/USER]&nbsp; After the Helena from Doug I wondered who would be first to bring us the late parallel to it for Theodora.&nbsp; Here it is. **NOPE TOTALLY MISSED IT ** Only two mints possible, Trier and Constantinople.&nbsp; Can you tell which it is?&nbsp; I do know that Trier was not as careful in the treatment of the mintmark, so have a suspicion, but you may be able to angle it around to see something.&nbsp; As for the Helena, can you read a mark?&nbsp; I don&#039;t think we&#039;ve seen enough obverses to nail it down that way.&nbsp; Anybody?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in