Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Hefty Pius drachm
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3215068, member: 19463"]Yes, there are hundreds of Pius drachm types and many relatively dull types compared to the interesting ones which tend also to be the rarities. I feel deficient not owing an eagle but I do have others that are more or less dull. </p><p><br /></p><p>Most common but not quite as common as the same type from Hadrian is the river god Nilus dated year 13 spelled out L TPICKAI. Where I am confused by this coin is the type regularly shows the Nilometer reading desired for a good crop which is 16 cubits. The usual legend is L TPICKAIIϚ but my coin is missing one of the I's. I wonder how to interpret this one. Dull type? Confusing?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]835821[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Athena just standing there is a bit dull but I don't pass up drachms with any eye appeal when cheap. Is this Emmett 1474? Why is it listed with "(shield)"? Certainly he chose to list enough minor variations with separate numbers that it was not necessary to show this as shield optional??? </p><p>[ATTACH=full]835822[/ATTACH] </p><p>My last one would be less dull if it were in better condition. Serapis is seated in a temple. I'm calling this Emmett 1668 but would appreciate help with the year date only partially shown. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]835823[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3215068, member: 19463"]Yes, there are hundreds of Pius drachm types and many relatively dull types compared to the interesting ones which tend also to be the rarities. I feel deficient not owing an eagle but I do have others that are more or less dull. Most common but not quite as common as the same type from Hadrian is the river god Nilus dated year 13 spelled out L TPICKAI. Where I am confused by this coin is the type regularly shows the Nilometer reading desired for a good crop which is 16 cubits. The usual legend is L TPICKAIIϚ but my coin is missing one of the I's. I wonder how to interpret this one. Dull type? Confusing? [ATTACH=full]835821[/ATTACH] Athena just standing there is a bit dull but I don't pass up drachms with any eye appeal when cheap. Is this Emmett 1474? Why is it listed with "(shield)"? Certainly he chose to list enough minor variations with separate numbers that it was not necessary to show this as shield optional??? [ATTACH=full]835822[/ATTACH] My last one would be less dull if it were in better condition. Serapis is seated in a temple. I'm calling this Emmett 1668 but would appreciate help with the year date only partially shown. [ATTACH=full]835823[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Hefty Pius drachm
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...