Hazy proof coins...

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by NumismaticGary, Jul 12, 2021.

  1. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    You are an incredibly knowledgeable individual. Thank you for all the responses. I hope you know I appreciate you!
    Most of these are actual haze, but seriously take a look at that tallgrass prairie. That’s not just haze, it’s smudged. Maybe someone wasn’t wearing a glove I don’t know, like in this example I own on a 1978 cent with a clear fingerprint - someone’s DNA from the 70s still chilling on the coin lol
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. steve westermeier

    steve westermeier Cancer sucks!

    What's a 'Covid'?.......... Never heard of it!
     
    NumismaticGary likes this.
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I have no argument with that, it is absolutely your right to do with it whatever you want.

    And your right to believe this as well if you wish.

    But let me ask you a question or two. Do you own any older coins, with older defined as having been minted before say 1950, and cleanly graded by say NGC or PCGS ? And if you say yes, would you also say that you believe those coins have been harmed in any way ?

    The point of course is that the TPGs and the vast majority of all collectors believe those coins have not been harmed in any way, and they are well deserving of the clean grades. But it is a near certainty those coins have been dipped.

    Of course it is your right to disagree with those who believe that the coins have not been harmed. But if you own some of those coins, and you believe they have been harmed, then why do you own them ?
     
  5. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    Terrible QC at the US Mint. Another reason I don’t buy from them directly. I wait a year or two and buy from the open market. Like buying a used car - let someone else take the depreciation.
     
  6. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    I actually don't. I don't like graded/slabbed coins, I like them raw! lol
    But I do have a few in my collection, all Morgan dollars, that I do suspect were cleaned. If I do in fact find out they are one day, I will sell them immediatly. I do NOT like cleaned coins at all! This 1900-O for example I am 99.9% sure is cleaned and I don't particularly like it, but it fills a hole in my collection. Take a look:

    11-$1-1900-Oo.jpg 12-$1-1900-Or.jpg
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Fair enough.

    As for the haze issue, folks can blame the mint if they want. But if they do they need to realize that there's nothing the mint can do about it, nothing they can do to stop it, because toning is the nature of coins.
     
  8. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    I think you're in denial defending them, no offense. I searched through 25 of the 2021 proof sets yesterday and 23 of them had EXTREME "haze" - some in shockingly bad condition. I blame them because before 2019 haze would only occur after a few years or so. NOT directly from them on products that aren't even a year old. If not the way they're manufacturing them, the way they're storing them before they send them to customers. Something is very wrong here I wish you would see that. I for one will not be buying any more proof sets from them again, they've gotten cheaper, standards have gotten much much lower, and nobody really wants proof sets anymore they've been slowly going out of style. In a couple of years people will be saying the same thing I am I guarantee... they have let the quality control go.
     
  9. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    Haze and toning are two different things. Plastics de-gassing causes haze. Sulfides in packaging cause toning. Look at the difference between how the GSA Carson City Dollars look and the Brown Ikes (proofs 1971-1974). They both came out at the same time, but one can be certified in the original holder by PCGS, NGC and ANACS and the other can't.
     
    charley and NumismaticGary like this.
  10. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    I do think you are onto something with de-gassing. I did note that when I opened the set I had there was an awful smell that seemed to be coming from the plastic sheet that holds the coins in place. Maybe just a change in manufacturer for the plastic is the cause, nothing more. I do own two of those brown box ikes, one is crazy colorful and hazy, the other is perfect.
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Uhhh guys, it is the gasses put off various materials, plus the air itself, that causes haze, and ALL other toning. Like it or not, haze IS toning.
     
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I agree. I also agree that the mint can't do much about it but all the different packaging they use is not helping.
     
    NumismaticGary likes this.
  13. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    think my lcs said it perfectly. “They are getting cheaper” cheaper plastic, lenses that open too easily. The W nickel and cent that came with the 2019 or 2020 sets aren’t hazy ;)
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    No, but then it never has. Mint packaging has been contributing to toning issues for as long as they have been minting coins.

    The thing is, if they didn't package them up all pretty like, hardly anybody would buy them. And the mint's mission by definition is to make money - as in profit ! They are required by law to show a profit.
     
  15. NumismaticGary

    NumismaticGary Active Member

    I don’t think many people are buying proof sets anymore in general do you? They’ve kinda gone out of style. It’s not the 70s and 80s anymore.
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Yeah, there's no doubt sales numbers of annual sets have dropped to a fraction of what they were at one time. But from a historical perspective that's pretty much normal because the interest of collectors has always changed over time. Whatever it is, popular for a while, unpopular for a while, and then it changes again. Been that way for, oh, 150 years or so.
     
  17. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    If I can feel it with my finger and wipe it off it isn't toning. It is a coating.
     
    NumismaticGary likes this.
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    OK, but if you can feel it with your finger - then it isn't haze !
     
    NumismaticGary likes this.
  19. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    I disagree. Haze is a deposit on the coin, and I can certainly feel it.
    Toning is a chemical reaction and I can not feel it.
    Is it a sensitivity issue? Maybe.
     
    TheFinn likes this.
  20. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Disagree all ya want, just forget this -

    And also don't forget that - early stages of toning, or some film as you believe - a quick dip in MS70 and it's gone like magic ! And the coin looks exactly like it is supposed to look ! And every TPG there is will give the coin a clean grade, they have in fact given clean grades to millions of coins that have been in MS70. And given clean grades to tens of millions of coins that have been dipped in coin dip.

    Final point being, no matter what you believe it is, haze is a very simple, quick, easy, and inexpensive thing to fix. And it will not harm the coin in any way. And no one will ever be able to tell that you did it. There is no scientific test, no piece of technology, no coin sniffer, nothing that can ever say it was done.
     
  21. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Thank you, I will.

    Accordingly, with your permission:

    Haze is a deposit on a coin.
    A person can feel it.
    Don't forget, I disagree, because, ya see, toning is a chemical reaction.
    You may disagree all you want, but, ya see, I can feel it.
    Ya see, the "Kinda sorta" explanation is 2 different things.
    Mashing down luster flowlines is priceless. If a person can mash down haze, a person can feel it, and, ya see, it would be a deposit.

    Ya see, I did not mention dipping or grading of dipped coins or detection of dipped coins at all. No reason to add as filler comments for the purpose of presenting an appearance of correctness to your position of mashing down luster flowlines and what scientific test can or can not detect a dip or what toning/haze is or is not. One has nothing do do with the other, excepting fingerprints.

    Final point being, I will agree that we disagree.
     
    NumismaticGary likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page