Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Having your coins professionally photographed
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EyeEatWheaties, post: 1133275, member: 26972"]Currently - I am of a different opinion on Red Copper 65RD and and up, probably because I am a newschool internet coin buyer. I don't think I have the patience to run around different shows. besides, with out other coins that I have, I doubt i would know what I was looking at with a coin in hand. I need to compare any potential purchase to a given, like a coin I already own.</p><p><br /></p><p>As far as imaging the coin to present detail more so than the luster. I feel that there is nothing more disappointing to have a well struck high grade cent arrive with lack luster brilliance. Everyone likes/looks for different things in their coins. To me, when I line up several 66 or 67RDs the ones that immediately grab your attention are the most lusterous at arms length, then you pull the loupe out. I feel that digital images of high grade copper should be presented in the same scenario. Luster first then expand up into high resolution for the details. My images are somewhere around 50x which is high enough to see the metal flow lines that create cartwheeling luster . </p><p><br /></p><p>I feel like I am consistently getting a good portion of both luster and detail, however I also know that there is room for improvement. Hopefully this summer I will have new equip producing better results and a top secret project will also come to fruition. lol</p><p><br /></p><p>Here again, I am going on what I have learned to like, what I notice, what I look for. To each his own... Of course my opinion can and will likely change, if my focus on what I am collecting/looking for, changes.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, I haven't embarked on finding EDS coins with perfect strikes and minimal to no tics and dings. I totally agree about luster vs details, If I looked at a coin first under a loupe for the details and then looked at in hand, I might have a different opinion about this. I feel like I am consistently getting a good portion of both. Keeping the lighting and camera settings the same when shooting MSRD copper is important for consistency..</p><p><br /></p><p>I have some coins that I shot early on that need to be reshot using my current set up however I think this set exemplifies what I have collected/learned so far. <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1209" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1209" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1209</a></p><p><br /></p><p>ANyways....[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EyeEatWheaties, post: 1133275, member: 26972"]Currently - I am of a different opinion on Red Copper 65RD and and up, probably because I am a newschool internet coin buyer. I don't think I have the patience to run around different shows. besides, with out other coins that I have, I doubt i would know what I was looking at with a coin in hand. I need to compare any potential purchase to a given, like a coin I already own. As far as imaging the coin to present detail more so than the luster. I feel that there is nothing more disappointing to have a well struck high grade cent arrive with lack luster brilliance. Everyone likes/looks for different things in their coins. To me, when I line up several 66 or 67RDs the ones that immediately grab your attention are the most lusterous at arms length, then you pull the loupe out. I feel that digital images of high grade copper should be presented in the same scenario. Luster first then expand up into high resolution for the details. My images are somewhere around 50x which is high enough to see the metal flow lines that create cartwheeling luster . I feel like I am consistently getting a good portion of both luster and detail, however I also know that there is room for improvement. Hopefully this summer I will have new equip producing better results and a top secret project will also come to fruition. lol Here again, I am going on what I have learned to like, what I notice, what I look for. To each his own... Of course my opinion can and will likely change, if my focus on what I am collecting/looking for, changes. For example, I haven't embarked on finding EDS coins with perfect strikes and minimal to no tics and dings. I totally agree about luster vs details, If I looked at a coin first under a loupe for the details and then looked at in hand, I might have a different opinion about this. I feel like I am consistently getting a good portion of both. Keeping the lighting and camera settings the same when shooting MSRD copper is important for consistency.. I have some coins that I shot early on that need to be reshot using my current set up however I think this set exemplifies what I have collected/learned so far. [URL="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1209"]http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=1209[/URL] ANyways....[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Having your coins professionally photographed
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...