Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cpm9ball, post: 1282001, member: 24633&quot;]The drawback to declaring the value of the 1895-O at less than it&#039;s (supposed) actual value is that if PCGS loses the coin, they will not reimburse you for more than its declared value. Whenever I submit coins, I always place a value that would be on the high side closer to retail. </p><p><br /></p><p>On your DDO, if you don&#039;t request and pay for the variety attribution, they will not bother to look for it. I can&#039;t count how many times I&#039;ve bought unattributed Morgans in both NGC &amp; PCGS slabs just because the original submitter didn&#039;t want to pay the extra fee. But, getting back to the DDO, again, if PCGS loses the coin, you have no way of proving that it actually was a DDO.</p><p><br /></p><p>In both cases, it&#039;s called CYA!</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the RD designation, and someone please correct me if I&#039;m mistaken, but I believe that PCGS stopped attributing this because of problems in the past with coins &quot;turning&quot; in the slab.</p><p><br /></p><p>It is always best to ship your coins &quot;Registered&quot;. It is the only method that requires every postal employee who handles the package to sign for it. There is no &quot;in-house&quot; tracking for Priority packages.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in